• Home
• About IME
  • Department Overview
  • Program Outcomes
  • Performance Criteria
  • Continuous
    Improvement TAC
  • Continuous
    Improvement EAC
  • Facilities
  • Research
• Bachelor's Programs
  • Industrial and
    Entrepreneurial Engineering
  • Engineering
    Design
    Technology
  • Engineering Management
    Technology
  • Manufacturing
    Engineering
    Technology
• Undergraduate Minors
  • Automotive Systems
  • Cast Metals
  • Integrated Supply
    Management
  • Manufacturing
    Technology
  • Plastics Processing
• Graduate Programs
  • Industrial Engineering
  • Engineering Management
  • Manufacturing Engineering
• Ph.D. Programs
  • Industrial Engineering
  • Evaluation
  • Engineering and
    Applied Sciences
• Courses
  • 1000 Level
  • 2000 Level
  • 3000 Level
  • 4000 Level
  • 5000 Level
  • 6000 Level
  • 7000 Level
• People
  • Faculty
  • Staff
  • Adjunct and PT Faculty
  • Doctoral Students
  • Advisory Board
  • Alumni
• Student Tools
  • CEAS Undergraduate
    Advisors
  • IME Carpool Postings
  • Student Organizations
  • CEAS Events Calendar
  • Guide to Engineering
    Library Resources
  • STEP
• Scholarships
  • Clausing Industrial, Inc.
  • Undergraduate IME
  • Herbert E. Ellinger
  • Roscoe Douglas
  • Leo S. Rayl
• Administrative Tools
• Transfer Credit
• Newsletters

Program Outcomes

Comparison of ABET Program Outcomes 2009-2010:

EAC Criterion 3 a-k vs. TAC Criterion 2 a-k

	EAC Criterion 3 Program Outcomes, a-k	TAC Criterion 2 Program Outcomes, a-k	EAC = TAC
a.	Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering	An ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of their disciplines to broadly-defined engineering technology activities	a = b
b.	Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data	An ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies	b = c
c.	An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability	An ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; and to apply experimental results to improve processes	c = d
d.	Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams	An ability to design systems, components, or processes for broadly-defined engineering technology problems appropriate to program educational objectives	d = e
e.	Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems	An ability to function effectively as a member or leader on a technical team	e = f
f.	An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility	An ability to identify, analyze, and solve broadly-defined engineering technology problems	f = i
g.	Ability to communicate effectively	An ability to communicate effectively regarding broadly-defined engineering technology activities	g = g
h.	The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context	An understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development	h = j
i.	A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning	An understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity	i = h
j.	A knowledge of contemporary issues	A knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global context	j = j
k.	Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice	A commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement	k = a (TAC-k, no EAC equiv.)