Skip To Nav
Mission and Vision
Mission and Vision

Fast Facts
Fast facts

Points of Pride
Points of pride

COLUMN 2 HEADER

Measures of Institutional Effectiveness


Updated June 18, 2014; Table legend below

Metric Type Name Actual Actual Change % Peer Average Time Period
Campus Profile
Total enrollment 24,598 -1.94% 25,548 2012-13
Annual change in total enrollment -1.95% -1,318.75% 0.31% 2012-13
Percent of undergraduate students receiving Pell grants 39.0% 2.63% 34.0% 2011-12
Race/ethnicity diversity as a percent of total students 18.9% 5.59% 22.9% 2012-13
  Race/ethnicity diversity as a percent of total staff 15.5%   20.6% 2011-12
  Race/ethnicity diversity as a percent of total instructional staff 12.6%   15.4% 2011-12
Average high school GPA of incoming freshmen 3.28 0.31% 3.30 2012-13
Student Outcomes
Six-year graduation rate 55.7% -0.36% 56.3% 2006-07
Bachelor degrees awarded per 100 FYES undergraduate students 21.8 5.82% 19.7 2011-12
Graduate degrees awarded per 100 FYES graduate students 44.5 -0.45% 48.1 2011-12
Second year retention rate 73.0% -1.35% 77.2% 2011-12
Outreach
International students as a percent of total 6.4% 14.29% 5.0% 2012-13
Number of seniors surveyed that participated in Study Abroad 12.0% -9.09% 13.0% 2012-13
Number of seniors surveyed that participated in Community Service or Volunteer Work 48.0% -14.29% 50.0% 2012-13
Research
Research expenditures per traditionally ranked faculty US$
33,280
-13.62% US$106,050 2011-12
Federal research expenditures per traditionally ranked faculty US$
17,795
-21.26% US$61,711 2011-12
Finance
Institutional support per FYES 1,908 9.03% 2,603 2011-12
Endowment per FYES student US$
9,500
4.53% US$10,202 2011-12
Alumni giving rate (undergraduate) 8.0% -11.11% 14.0% 2011-12

Institutional Effectiveness Measures Print Version

Legend

Each of the measures of institutional effectiveness appears as part of the university scorecard.  A status indicator appears far left column, along with other values that describe the status of a measure. These indicators allow the user to see detail about how far above or below the peer average the measure is.  The symbol and color depend on how the measure performs compared to the peer average and are based on the tolerances set.  The current tolerance is set to 10% of the peer average.

Symbol Color Performance
Green Circle Green More than one tolerance above target
Green Half Circle Partially Green Within one tolerance above target
Yellow Diamond Yellow Within one tolerance of the target
Red Half Square Partially Red More than one tolerance below target
Red Square Red More than two tolerances below target

Also provided is a trend indicator, just right of the status indicator. The trend indicator shows the direction of change in the performance of a measure (i.e. whether it is improving, staying the same, or getting worse). Trends are determined by comparing performance from one year to the next. The trend indicator shows an improvement or a decline in performance using up or down arrows and based on whether the performance has changed at least 5 percent. A dash is used to indicate no change or less than 5 percent change. It is important to note, that a performance improvement can be represented by a green down arrow if a decline in the measure value indicates a positive.

Data provided with each measure include, in order of column appearance, the value of the indicator for WMU (Actual), the percentage change from the prior year (Actual Change %), the peer average for the same year (Peer Average), and the time period of the data presented (Time Period). (Depicted below.)

Metric Type Name Actual Actual Change % Peer Average Time Period
Six-year graduation rate 55.7% -0.36% 56.3% 2006-07

As an illustrative example, if one were to examine the six-year graduation rate measure, one would see that WMU’s six-year graduation rate for the 2006-07 cohort is 55.7%. The average six-year graduation rate of WMU’s Carnegie peers was 56.3% for the same cohort. Therefore, the status indicator is a partially green circle indicating that WMU’s six-year graduation rate is above the peer average but not by more than 10% of the peer average. The trend indicator is a green up arrow because the difference between the peer average and WMU’s actual six-year graduation rate increased over 5 percent between the 2005-06 and 2006-07 cohorts.