|
1
|
- Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Conference
November 26, 2007
|
|
2
|
- The Participants will:
- Become familiar with the two tools
- Data Guidebook for Data Points
- Measurement Tool for School Principals
- Understand the relationship between the tools and the MI School
Improvement Framework
- Connect data with school improvement
|
|
3
|
- Michigan received a Wallace Foundation grant with a focus on
data-informed decision-making
|
|
4
|
- Partners
- Governor’s Office
- Michigan Department of Education
- School districts
- Benton Harbor Area Schools
- Flint Community Schools
- Grand Rapids Public Schools
- Lansing Public Schools
- Professional Associations
- Michigan Association of School Boards (MASB)
- Michigan Association of School Administrators (MASA)
- Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals (MASSP)
- Michigan Elementary and Middle School Principals Administrators
(MEMSPA)
- Universities
- Central Michigan University
- Eastern Michigan University
- Western Michigan University
- Michigan Leadership Framework Endorsement (MI-LIFE)
|
|
5
|
- A new paradigm about how data can be used to raise student achievement
- A need for training, models, and guidance on using data to shape school
improvement processes and classroom practices
- A system for managing data overflow
- A need for efficient tools to collect, access, and analyze data
- A need for principals and teachers to incorporate data-informed
decision-making in their daily work
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- If the purpose of school is to ensure that all students learn, what
data will help schools understand if they are effectively carrying out
their purpose?
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Strand I: Teaching for Learning
- Strand II: Leadership
- Strand III: Personnel & Professional Development
- Strand IV: School & Community Relations
- Strand V: Data & Information Management
|
|
14
|
- Standards and Benchmarks:
- Standard 2,Benchmark B: Delivery
- Type of Data:
- MEAP data at the item and theme levels
- Type of Analysis:
- Conduct an analysis of student performance at the item and theme
levels; if the content is covered in the lesson plans, the lower
percentage of students get the items or themes correct, the greater the
chance there is an issue of instructional delivery
|
|
15
|
- Select a benchmark from the Guidebook and talk with someone next to you
- Discuss the examples for the benchmark you selected regarding how (a)
the type of data and (b) the type of analysis apply to your school
- Based on your discussion, how would you use the Data Guidebook in your
school?
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- What does the instrument measure?
- The instrument measures the extent to which principals engage in
data-informed decision-making of high impact strategies.
- The 11 high impact strategies are synthesized by Marzano (2003).
- The 11 high impact strategies are positively correlated with student
achievement (Table 1).
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- What are the instrument’s reliability and validity?
- Based on a sample of 258 principals, the data indicate the instrument
has a high level of reliability and validity for all the subscales as
well as for the whole instrument (see page 4).
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Wallace Foundation Website:
- www.wallacefoundation.org
- WMU-Wallace Grant Website:
- www.wmich.edu/wallacegrant
- Dr. Van Cooley, Western Michigan University
- Dr. Jianping Shen, Western Michigan University
- Dr. Patricia Reeves, Western Michigan University
- Dr. Walter Burt, Western Michigan University
- Dr. J. Mark Rainey, Western Michigan University
- Dr. Gary Marx, Eastern Michigan University
- Dr. James Berry, Eastern Michigan University
- 269-387-3896
|