Current state of financial and administrative operations
Today, many routine tasks—processing forms, arranging travel, and completing certain HR, finance and other administrative work—are distributed across campus and handled in highly variable ways. This level of dispersion creates inconsistency, limits scalability, leads to coverage gaps and results in uneven workloads. The University will assess current practices, stakeholder needs and service expectations to determine which future model would best support WMU.
In practical terms, this effort starts with understanding what work is being done, where it is performed, how it is experienced by those who rely on it, and where shared services or clearer ownership could improve outcomes. The findings will inform a possible design of a future shared-services model for financial and administrative functions.
Benefits
For the University
- Clear visibility into how finance and administrative work is currently distributed and where process redesign could improve systems, scalability and service quality.
- Clearer decisions about which services should remain within individual units, which could be shared and where standardization could reduce unnecessary variation and risk.
- Stronger alignment between administrative structures and institutional priorities by using data, stakeholder input and service-design principles rather than informal workarounds.
For colleges and departments
- More consistent support for common administrative work through clearer processes, service definitions and ownership of routine transactions.
- Clearer service expectations over time, including turnaround standards, escalation paths and accountability for common requests.
- Less reliance on one-off practices within individual units, broader shared support, improved service continuity, and reduced disruption when workloads shift or vacancies occur.
For affected teammates
- Clearer expectations around administrative work, how it connects to other functions and where process improvements could ease daily work.
- More consistency in how common services are defined and delivered across units, helping campus partners know what to expect.
- A deliberate approach to service improvement that begins with listening, data collection and service analysis before major design decisions are made.
Planning approach
Leadership: Dr. Chris Cheatham, executive vice president for academic affairs and provost; Keith Hahn, general counsel; Nicole Kalmbach, senior director of business operations for student affairs; Erica Martinez, senior director of business operations in academic affairs; Colleen Scarff, associate vice president for business and finance; and Jan Van Der Kley, vice president for business and finance, will serve as the steering committee. Western is partnering with Huron for this 7-month, assessment-oriented and evidence-based effort.
Timeline and phases
Assessment (5 weeks)
Assess the current state by establishing a quantitative baseline of how work is distributed today. The team will gather stakeholder input from supervisors, divisional leaders, affected employees and campus partners through interviews and focus groups. The goal will be to understand needs, dependencies and service expectations; define which activities are in and out of scope of the effort; and identify where current processes create inconsistency, undue effort or risk.
Design (8 weeks)
Translate findings into a future-state design, including workflow analysis, organizational structure evaluation and determination, service catalog, service-level agreements and key performance indicators. Map the current organizational chart and job descriptions to the new design.
Implementation (16 weeks)
Implement the new design into operation and focus on stabilizing services over time.
Recent communications
Update
The University’s Financial and Administrative Operations Assessment project remains on track in Phase 1 as of Sept. 4, 2026. Key efforts have focused on completing the Huron Administrative Activity Study (HAAS), conducting stakeholder interviews and gathering transaction data to support the current-state assessment. HAAS is an online tool used to identify the administrative functions and activities performed by employees who participated in the study.
Seven interviews were conducted and the HAAS survey participation was completed on Sept. 2. Huron received 222 responses from the total population of 225, representing a 98.7% participation rate. We thank everyone who completed the survey, recognizing the time and effort it took during the busy start to the semester.
The project steering committee, along with representatives from the other Administrative Redesign projects, met with the Faculty Senate Executive Board on Aug. 28 to update the board on the project’s current status and to answer questions from the board.
Over the coming weeks, the team will finalize analysis of HAAS data; complete remaining interviews and focus groups with business managers, key staff managers and University leaders; and develop the Phase 1 current-state assessment report. This work will help inform recommendations ahead of the anticipated launch of Phase 2 within the next four to six weeks.
Connect with Administrative Redesign leadership
Other Administrative Redesign initiatives
IT redesign
Campus technology teams are coming together under unified leadership to strengthen security and simplify support.
MarCom organizational design
Marketing and communications functions are consolidating into one team to sharpen WMU's competitive edge.
Strategic sourcing and spending
A new approach to procurement and contracts aims to stretch every non-personnel dollar further.
Space utilization
Classroom scheduling and investment decisions are shifting to match how space is actually used.