Goals and Competencies
Department/Program: Master of Science in Medicine, Physician Assistant
Program Director: Andrew Zolp, MSM, PA-C, Program Director
Date updated/submitted: August 2026
Mission
The Department of Physician Assistant at Western Michigan University is dedicated to educating competent, caring physician assistants to practice primary care medicine in all areas of society.
Goal #1: The Western Michigan University Physician Assistant Program is committed to developing physician assistants who exhibit professionalism in varied roles with multiple populations across society.
Measures
1. 95% of students will score “3.5” or higher on the professionalism assessment as part of the summative evaluation. Rating scale: 0 to 5.
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | Professionalism Evaluation | |
| Score – 0 to 3 (Below BM) | Score – 3.5 to 5 (Meets BM) | ||
| 2023 * | 38 | 0 students – 0% | 38 students - 100% |
| 2024 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
| 2025 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
* This measure was implemented with class of 2023
2. 95% of students will receive a final professionalism score of “satisfactory” or better on all (9-11 depending on placements) preceptor evaluations of the student. Rating scale: unacceptable, needs work, satisfactory, good, exceeds based on question: “Demonstrating proper professional appearance and attitude, ethical conduct and respect for patients, families and the healthcare team”
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | Preceptor Evaluation regarding Professionalism | |
| Needs Improvement (Below BM) | Satisfactory or better (Meets BM) | ||
| 2023 | 38 | 0 students- 0% | 38 students- 100% |
| 2024 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
| 2025 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
| 3-year average- 100% | |||
Goal #2: The Western Michigan University Physician Assistant Program graduates physician assistants well-versed in the utilization of evidence-based medicine in the management of patients.
Measures
- 95% of students will pass the evidence-based competency measure on the summative evaluation.
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | EMB Summative Eval 95% or greater (Meets BM) |
| 2023 | 38 | 38 students = 100% |
| 2024 | 40 | 40 students=100% |
| 2025 | 40 | 40 students=100% |
| 3-year average 100% |
2. 95% of students will receive a final score of “satisfactory” or better on all evidence-based (9-11 depending on placements) preceptor evaluations of the student. Rating scale: unacceptable, needs work, satisfactory, good, exceeds based on question “Recommending medications; taking into account side effects, patient profile, drug interactions and evidence based recommendations”
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | Preceptor Evaluation regarding using evidence-based medicine | |
| Needs Improvement (Below BM) | Satisfactory or better (Meets BM) | ||
| 2023 | 38 | 0 students- 0% | 38 students- 100% |
| 2024 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
| 2025 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
| 3-year average 100% | |||
Goal #3: The Western Michigan University Physician Assistant Program graduates will effectively work and communicate with patients, physicians, and other health care professionals.
Measures
1. 95% of students will receive a final communication score of “satisfactory” or better on all (9-11 depending on placements) preceptor evaluations of the student. Rating scale: unacceptable, needs work, satisfactory, good, exceeds based on the following questions: “Summarizing and articulating pertinent patient data in a concise and accurate manner to preceptor of record or other provider”. “Providing appropriate patient and family education and/or appropriate anticipatory guidance.”
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | Preceptor Evaluation regarding communication | |
| Needs Improvement (Below BM) | Satisfactory or better (Meets BM) | ||
| 2023 | 38 | 0 students – 0% | 38 students – 100% |
| 2024 | 40 | 0 students – 0% | 40 students – 100% |
| 2025 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
| 3-year average 100% | |||
2. 100% of all students will receive 3.5 or higher on the summative exam regarding communication. Rating system: 0-5.
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | Summative Evaluation regarding communication | |
| 69.9% or less (Below BM) | 70% or greater (Meets BM) | ||
| 2023 | 38 | 0 students- 0% | 38 students- 100% |
| 2024 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
| 2025 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 40 students- 100% |
3. Student impression of their Interprofessional Education Experience will rate 50% or greater for “Strongly Agree” plus “Agree”.
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | End-of-Program Survey student impression on Interprofessional Education Experience | |
| (Below BM) | 50% or greater for “Strongly Agree” plus “Agree” (Meets BM) | ||
| 2023 | 38 | Did not fall below BM | 91.67% |
| 2024 | 40 | Did not fall below BM | 76.47% |
| 2025 | 40 | Did not fall below BM | 85% |
| 3-year average = 84.38% | |||
Goal #4: The Western Michigan University Physician Assistant program encourages students to continue a strong tradition of service to the community.
Measures
1. Participation in MAPA charity drive. BM set at 50% student participation for event (s).
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | Participation in MAPA Charity Drive | |
| 49.9% or less (Below BM) | 50% or greater (Meets BM) | ||
| 2023 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 100% of students |
| 2024 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 100% of students |
| 2025 | 40 | 0 students- 0% | 100% of students |
| 3-year average = 100% | |||
2. The PA program will participate in a minimum of two charity event per cohort.
| Class of | Number of students in cohort | Number of Charity Drives per Cohort | |
| 0-1 (Below BM) | 2 or more (Meets BM) | ||
| 2023 | 40 | 0 events- 0% | 3 Events |
| 2024 | 40 | 0 events- 0% | 2 Events |
| 2025 | 40 | 0 events- 0% | 2 Events |
| 3-year average = 100% | |||
The program uses the following assessment tools for testing student success in meeting the aforementioned learning outcomes:
| Instrument, Activity, Assignment | Purpose | How Graded |
| Case Studies | Critical medical thinking | Rubric |
| Diagnostic Skill Project | Practical clinical application | Faculty reviewed, student self-corrected |
| End-of-Semester Review | Evaluate student performance and professionalism | Discussion and observation |
| End-of-Rotation Exam (EOR) | Summative evaluation of knowledge | Multiple choice exam |
| History and Physicals (H&P) | Practical clinical application | Rubric |
| Hands-on Diagnostic Skills | Demonstrate proficiency of clinical skills | Faculty observation, Rubric |
| Lecture and Lab Exams | Summative evaluation of medical knowledge | Multiple choice exam, Rubric |
| Mentoring Evaluation | External evaluation of student preparedness | Rubric |
| Mentoring H&P | Practical clinical application | Rubric |
| Mentoring Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan Note (SOAP) | Practical clinical application | Rubric |
| Module Exam | Summative evaluation of medical knowledge | Multiple choice exam |
| Online CDC Activity | Standardized content | Self-evaluated |
| Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) | Practical clinical experience Critical medical thinking | Faculty observed, Rubric |
| Preceptor Evaluation | External evaluation of student preparedness | Rubric |
| Presentation (Individual or Group) | Peer to peer education Student collaboration | Faculty observation, Rubric |
| Role-Playing | Student immersion into medical disparity and patient education | Faculty observation |
| Simulated Patient | Practical experience Critical medical thinking | Faculty observed, Rubric |
| Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan Note (SOAP) | Practical clinical application | Rubric |
| Summative Evaluation | Summative evaluation of medical knowledge Critical medical thinking Practical clinical application | Multiple choice questions, Faculty observation, Rubric |
| Team Based Learning (TBL) Activity | Critical medical thinking | Rubric, Multiple Choice Questions |
| Written Assignment | Critical medical thinking | Rubric |
| Written Group Work Activity | Student collaboration Critical medical thinking | Rubric Rubric |
Western Michigan University Physician Assistant Program Competencies
Competencies
1. Medical Knowledge
- 1.1 Apply biomedical, clinical, and behavioral science knowledge to the prevention, diagnosis, and management of medical and surgical conditions across the lifespan.
- 1.2 Recognize normal and abnormal clinical, laboratory, and diagnostic findings and incorporate them into clinical decision-making.
- 1.3 Apply evidence-based principles of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapy to patient care.
- 1.4 Integrate principles of health promotion, disease prevention, and screening into clinical practice.
2. Clinical Reasoning and Problem-Solving Abilities
- 2.1 Formulate a prioritized differential diagnosis using synthesized patient history, physical examination, and diagnostic data.
- 2.2 Develop patient-centered diagnostic, therapeutic, and management plans using current evidence and clinical judgment.
3. Clinical and Technical Skills
- 3.1 Perform focused patient assessments appropriate to the clinical situation including history and physical exam.
- 3.2 Safely and effectively perform technical procedures expected of an entry-level physician assistant.
- 3.3 Document patient encounters accurately and develop appropriate orders, prescriptions, referrals, and therapeutic plans.
- 3.4 Provide patient-centered education and preventative care recommendations.
4. Interpersonal Skills
- 4.1 Communicate effectively with patients, families, caregivers, and healthcare professionals through accurate verbal, nonverbal, and written communication.
- 4.2 Collaborate effectively as a member of an interprofessional healthcare team.
- 4.3 Adapt communication strategies to meet the needs of diverse patients, situations, and healthcare environments.
5. Professional Behaviors
- 5.1 Demonstrate respectful, ethical, and accountable behavior in all professional interactions.